rewrite this post
Generate a detailed, engaging, and SEO-optimized blog post on
Reintroducing wolves to the Scottish Highlands could lead to an expansion of native woodland which could take in and store one million tonnes of CO2 annually, according to a new study led by researchers at the University of Leeds.
The team modelled the potential impact that wolves could have in four areas classified as Scottish Wild Land, where the eating of tree saplings by growing red deer populations is suppressing natural regeneration of trees and woodland.
They used a predator-prey model to estimate that a reintroduction of wolves to areas in the Cairngorms, South-west Highlands, Central Highlands and North-west Highlands would lead to a total population of around 167 wolves — enough to reduce red deer populations to a level that would allow trees to regenerate naturally.
Control of red deer by wolves could lead to an expansion of native woodland that would take up — or sequester — one million tonnes of CO2 each year — equivalent to approximately 5% of the carbon removal target for UK woodlands that has been suggested by the UK’s Climate Change Committee as being necessary to reach net-zero by 2050.
The researchers estimate that each wolf would lead to an annual carbon uptake capability of 6080 tonnes of CO2, making each of the predators “worth” £154,000, using accepted current valuations of carbon.
The results of their study are published today (17 February 2025) in the journal Ecological Solutions and Evidence.
This is the first time that the potential impacts of a wolf reintroduction on woodland expansion and carbon storage in the UK have been assessed, and the researchers believe the results provide further evidence of the role large carnivores can play in delivering the nature-based solutions required to address the climate emergency.
Lead author Professor Dominick Spracklen of the University of Leeds’ School of Earth and Environment said: “There is an increasing acknowledgement that the climate and biodiversity crises cannot be managed in isolation.
“We need to look at the potential role of natural processes such as the reintroduction of species to recover our degraded ecosystems and these in turn can deliver co-benefits for climate and nature recovery.”
Wolves were eradicated from Scotland around 250 years ago, leaving red deer with no natural predators and allowing their populations to grow across the country. Despite ongoing management, red deer numbers in Scotland have significantly increased over the last century, with the latest estimates thought to be as high as 400,000.
Lack of natural tree regeneration has contributed to the long-term decline and loss of native woodland. Scotland today has one of the lowest levels of native woodland in Europe, with only 4% of country covered. The natural regeneration of trees is largely restricted to areas where deer are excluded by fencing. More intensive deer management in some locations has been shown to help tree regeneration, with an increasing number of seedlings when red deer numbers were reduced to fewer than four per km2.
Discussions around potential large carnivore introductions to the UK and elsewhere are ongoing. The wolf population in western Europe now exceeds 12,000 and they occupy 67% of their former European historical range, including human-dominated landscapes in Central Europe. Even the Netherlands, a country considerably more densely populated than Scotland now has wolves resident again.
The researchers recognise that the debate around the reintroduction of wolves to the Scottish Highlands will not be without controversy, particularly among livestock farmers and deer stalkers.
However, they argue that benefits of reintroducing wolves need to be considered. The financial benefits associated with carbon uptake and storage would be in addition to the other well documented economic and ecological impacts of wolf reintroduction, including ecotourism, a reduction in deer-related road traffic accidents, a reduction in Lyme disease associated with deer and a reduction in the cost of deer culls.
Lee Schofield, a co-author of the study, added: “Our aim is to provide new information to inform ongoing and future discussions about the possibility of wolf reintroductions both in the UK and elsewhere.
“We recognise that substantial and wide-ranging stakeholder and public engagement would clearly be essential before any wolf reintroduction could be considered. Human-wildlife conflicts involving carnivores are common and must be addressed through public policies that account for people’s attitudes for a reintroduction to be successful.”
formatted in clean HTML for WordPress Elementor.
Content Guidelines:
Trending News: Gather the latest updates, key facts, statistics, and expert insights from credible sources.
Structured Formatting: Use H2/H3 headings, concise 2-3 sentence paragraphs, bullet points, and proper spacing for readability.
Rich Media: Embed properly licensed, high-quality images with clickable source links (no placeholders).
Citations & Sources: Hyperlink authoritative references to ensure accuracy and trustworthiness.
Content Optimization:
Sentence Variation: Rewrite sentences while maintaining meaning, alternating between active and passive voice.
Synonym Substitution: Use diverse vocabulary to improve readability and avoid repetition.
Unique Introductions & Conclusions: Craft different introduction styles and conclude with expert insights, key takeaways, or a future outlook.
Smooth Transitions: Use varied transition phrases like “Additionally,” “Another key point is,” or “What’s more.”
Fact Rewriting: Present information uniquely while ensuring accuracy.
Content Structuring: Prioritize key takeaways first, followed by background details for a fresh perspective.
Important Notes:
Do not include AI reasoning or explanations.
Deliver only the fully formatted, ready-to-publish article.
No calls to action (CTAs); focus solely on informative content.
General Content Disclaimer
The content on this website, including articles generated by artificial intelligence or syndicated from third-party sources, is provided for informational purposes only. We do not own the rights to all images and have not independently verified the accuracy of all information presented. Opinions expressed are those of the original authors and do not necessarily reflect our views. Reader discretion is advised, as some content may contain sensitive, controversial, or unverified information. We are not responsible for user-generated content, technical issues, or the accuracy of external links. Some content may be sponsored or contain affiliate links, which will be identified accordingly. By using this website, you agree to our privacy policy. For concerns, including copyright infringement (DMCA) notices, contact us at info@keewee.news